VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Kumaresan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1869/2016

Judgment

ORDER The writ petitioner instructed his counsel to withdraw this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same with liberty to approach the concerned authorities and has circulated a letter in this connection.

¶2Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the concerned authorities. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

12.06.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

3.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Nagercoil – 1, Kanyakumari District.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

12.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.1623 and 1624 of 2016 R.Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 3.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Nagercoil – 1, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the third respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.02006/A1/2014 dated 25.04.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the respondents to revise the pension of the petitioner on the basis of the scale of pay of 15600-39100-5400. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, For M/s.Ajmal Associates. For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.