VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

John Peter, v. The Govt. of Tamilnadu,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18893/2016

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner died on 30.11.2020 and none from the family of the petitioner approached him to prosecute the case further. In view of the same, no further orders are required.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In view of the submission of the learned counsel, this Writ Petition is closed as no adjudication is required.

¶4No costs.

12.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 005.

3.The District Collector/Inspector of Panchayats, Tiruchi District, Tiruchi.

4.The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) Tamilnadu, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 015.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.18893 of 2016

12.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.18893 of 2016 John Peter ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The District Collector/Inspector of Panchayats, Tiruchi District, Tiruchi. 4.The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) Tamilnadu, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 015. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the fourth respondent pen 3/3/20305008/ADK dated 07.11.2014 and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant pensionery benefits to the petitioner from the date of his retirement taking into account his entire period of service including 50% of his service as part time panchayat clerk 01.09.1972 to 28.12.1990 (18 years 4 moths and 28 days) and to make necessary revision in the pension payment Order already issued in his favour. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.