VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Jeyapal, S/O. Kandasamy, v. The Commissioner

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 November 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18911/2016

Judgment

ORDER The case of the petitioner is that the respondents 4 to 6 are running a chicken stall, fish stall and mutton stall, respectively at Shanmugapuram, Palani, Dindigul District and they are causing nuisance by dumping the wastes in the drainage. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the nuisance by taking action against the respondents 4 to 6.

¶2The learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 & 3 / Municipality submits that the Municipality is cleaning the garbage everyday in between 03.00 p.m. to 04.30 p.m.

¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent submits that the second respondent has conducted a spot inspection on 14.11.2023 and found that the respondents 4 to 6 are not running any shops at present.

¶4Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

27.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Commissioner, Palani Municipal Corporation,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶3The Health Officer, Palani Municipality, Palani, Dindigul District.

27.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Jeyapal ... Petitioner versus 1. The Commissioner, Palani Municipal Corporation, 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3. The Health Officer, Palani Municipality, Palani, Dindigul District. 4. Sikkandar 5. Shanmugam 6. Eswaran ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the nuisance by taking action against the respondents 4 to 6 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For R1 : Mr.L.P.Maurya For R2 and R3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader For R4 to R6 : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.