- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1894/2023
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted a copy of the letter dated 09.10.2023 issued by the Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai to him, wherein it is stated that the encroached portion of the building had already been demolished and therefore, the order passed by this Court has been complied with. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
18.10.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva To
1.Mr.B.Vishnu Chandran, The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
2.Mr.Karthikeyan, The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Yuva
18.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN G.Muthumarri ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr.B.Vishnu Chandran, The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.Mr.Karthikeyan, The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court dated 25.04.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.9931 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.