M.Arockiaraj @ Arockiasamy v. The District Collector,

O R D E R At the hearing on 27.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Learned Special Government Pleader submits, on written instructions, that proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act were initiated and that a sum of about Rs.70,000/- was recovered. Consequently, she submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been substantially redressed.

¶3Accordingly, W.P.(MD).No.19035 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs.

03.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. sbn W.P.(MD)No.19

035 of 2016

03.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :03.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY M.Arockiaraj @ Arockiasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to initiate proceedings under the revenue recovery Act as required by the second respondent vide letters dated 29.06.2015 and 18.09.2015 and recover the arrears within a time frame. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader