- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 September 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22869/2023
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 21.09.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial), for withdrawing this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2Based on the letter dated 21.09.2023, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
27.09.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Managing Director, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.
¶2The Regional Manager, Annanagar, Madurai – 625 020.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
27.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Murugan ... Petitioner versus 1. The Managing Director, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. 2. The Regional Manager, Annanagar, Madurai – 625 020. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to make arrangement for sanctioning transportation bills for transporting the paddy bags from the TNCSC DPC centers to godowns by the petitioner's society namely M.U.8 Usilampatti Taluk, Agricultural Producers Co-op. Marketing Society Ltd., Usilampatti and to give the sanctioned transport charges in favour of the petitioner within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.