Rajangam, S/O.Periyamari v. The District Collector

O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.19373 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P(MD).Nos.13966 and 13967 of 2016 are closed.

28.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No ssb To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ssb

28.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P(MD).Nos.13966 and 13967 of 2016 Rajangam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4.Marichamy ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, call for the records of the third respondent in his proceedings No.NIL (Peace Committee meeting decision No.6) dated 30.09.2016 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of law. For Petitioner :Mr.G.Marimuthu For Respondents :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R1 and R2