VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Nagaraj v. The District Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22144/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that the request of this petitioner for water connection has not been considered by the respondents.

2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that there is a dispute in drawing water connection line to the petitioner's house. However, the Tahsildar is taking steps to obtain police protection and to provide water connection to the petitioner's house and it would be completed within a period of eight weeks.

4.Recording the above submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

27.09.2023 dsk To

1.The District Collector, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk Office, Musiri, Tirchy District.

3.The Block Development Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

4.The President, Perur Village Panchayat, Perur, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

27.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Nagaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Trichy District. 2.The Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk Office, Musiri, Tirchy District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Musiri, Trichy District. 4.The President, Perur Village Panchayat, Perur, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 5.Uthandan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to provide water connection to the petitioner's house in Door No.77B, which is situated at Rakkampatti Village, Velakkanatham Post, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District based on the petitioner's representation dated 09.06.2023. For petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Ms.D.Farjana Ghousia, Nos.1 and 2 Special Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.C.Satheesh, Nos.3 and 4 Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.