- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 16489/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
This petition has been filed seeking direction to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry without due process of law.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that based on the complaint given by the third respondent herein, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, the petitioner appeared once. But later failed to appear. Thereafter, the present petition has been filed stating that he has been harassed.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is one of the partners and not involved in the above said issue between the defacto complainant and in the above said partnership, since he has already retired from the above said partnership.
4.If it is so, lets the petitioner appear and produce the documents of the retirement to the second respondent. Even for his own benefit the above said enquiry must be undertaken to his logical end. There shall be a direction to the second respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.This petition is disposed of, accordingly.
13.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsg To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Inspector of Police, (L & O) District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. vsg
13.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN V.Pushparaj Davidsingh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, (L & O) District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi District. 3.V.Selvam ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to issue direction to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry without due process of law. For petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar 1and 2 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.