VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthuvel.M v. The Managing Director

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22054/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner claiming to be a Cable TV operator for for the area around Kalaingar Nagar, Thoppu Theru, Velders Nagar, Alanganathapuram, South Tharanallur, etc., at Tiruchirapalli District has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction directing the third respondent not to renew the fourth respondent's postal registration and consequently direct the 1st and 3rd respondents not to permit the fourth respondent to operate as an LCO under the first respondent Corporation, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 04.09.2023.

¶2This Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition that the petitioner is not having any right for the relief claimed by him, similarly, there is no such obligation on the part of the respondents. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No.

11.09.2023 Internet:Yes am

B.PUGALENDHI, J. am

11.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD)No.18373 of 2023 M.Muthuvel ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd ., 34/123, 6th Floor, Dukar Tower, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Senior Postmaster, Tiruchirappalli Head Post Office, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.The Special Tahsildar/Assistant Manager, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Tiruchirappalli. 4.Silambarasan ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent not to renew the fourth respondent's postal registration and consequently direct the 1st and 3rd respondents not to permit the fourth respondent to operate as an LCO under the first respondent Corporation, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 04.09.2023. For Petitioner :Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.