- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 July 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 19624/2016
Judgment
O R D E R Mr.G.S.Asok Adhithyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner in the Writ Petition is died and the family members of the deceased petitioner are not interested to prosecute the case and therefore, he requested to close the Writ Petition.
¶2The request of the learned counsel is placed on record.
¶3In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed as no further adjudication is required. No costs.
13.07.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No rm To
1.The Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Secretary Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai.
2.The Managing Director, The Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
3.The Executive Engineer, The Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board/RWS Division, No.7, Ganesh Nagar, Opp. to Mattuthavani Bus Stand, Madurai - 625 007.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. rm
13.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND S.Ravichandran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Secretary Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Managing Director, The Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 3.The Executive Engineer, The Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board/RWS Division, No.7, Ganesh Nagar, Opp. to Mattuthavani Bus Stand, Madurai - 625 007. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records and quash the impugned order passed No.C1/HD/EE/27744/2015 dated 09.02.2016 by the second respondent and directing the respondents to sanction notional promotion to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Sulega for Mr.K.Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj - for R1 Special Government Pleader Mr.B.Vijaya karthikeyan - for R2 & R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.