S.Vasudevan, S/O.(Late) v. The Authorized Officer

O R D E R Both at the hearing on 28.03.2023 and at the hearing today, the petitioner was not represented. Learned standing counsel for the Canara Bank submits that the petitioner's loan account was regularized and that, therefore, the respondent does not intend to take any steps to attach the pension of the petitioner.

¶2By taking note of these subsequent developments, W.P.(MD) No.19650 of 2016 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

11.04.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.19650 of 2016

11.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :11.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.19650 of 2016 S.Vasudevan ... Petitioner Vs. The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, No.19, Perumal Kovil Samadhi Street, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from attaching the petitioner's pension amount which is credited in his SB General Account No.1224101028058 and not to transfer the same to any account. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar