VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Balasubramanian v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 19731/2016

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous and as such, no further adjudication is required.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in my considered view, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and it has to be dismissed as infructuous.

¶4Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

20.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Madurai.

2.The Administrator, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.19731 of 2016

20.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.19731 of 2016 1.S.Balasubramanian 2.E.Ganesan 3.P.Nagaraj 4.C.Pandian 5.S.Radhakrishnan 6.Sivakumar 7.V.Thangaraj 8.P.Veeramani 9.T.Ganeshamoorthy 10.R.Balan 11.S.Balasubramanian 11.G.Pandian ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Madurai. 2.The Administrator, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of declaration declaring the action of the respondents in resolving to pay the commuted value of pension payable for the belated payment of the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently directing the respondents to settle the commuted value of pension of the petitioners in one lump sum with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from the date of retirement of the petitioners to till the date of payment of the said amount within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For R 2 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For R1 : Mr.A.Jayaraman

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.