- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Bench
- P.B. Balaji
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1954/2019
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and the respondent states that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.
¶2Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
31.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No tsg To
1.The I Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil
2.The Record Keeper, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.B.BALAJI,J. tsg
31.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P.(MD).No.10011 of 2019 N.Moorthy ...Petitioner Vs. Vaniga Samudhaya Vagai Sree Durga Ammancoil, East Street, Nagercoil, Represented by its Managing Trustee, S.Murugesan. ...Respondent PRAYER: This Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to fair and decreetal order dated 21.10.2019 in E.P.No.7 of 2019 in O.S.No.134 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil and set aside the same and consequently allow the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For Respondent : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.