Muthaleeppu, v. Government of India

ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that his application for re-issuance of his passport has not been considered by the respondents based on the adverse report given by the Police, has filed this writ petition in the year 2016.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner's passport was renewed and the same was given to him and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.

¶3Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

28.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Ministry of External Affairs, Passport Office, Tiruchirappalli.

¶2The Regional Passport Officer, Passport Office, Tiruchirappalli Municipal Water Tank Building, W.B.Road, Tiruchirappalli.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

28.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Muthaleeppu ... Petitioner versus 1. Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, Passport Office, Tiruchirappalli. 2. The Regional Passport Officer, Passport Office, Tiruchirappalli Municipal Water Tank Building, W.B.Road, Tiruchirappalli. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records pertaining to impugned order dated 29.09.2016 in TR2079436308116 on the file of 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to issue a renewal passport pertaining to the petitioner's application dated 13.06.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Jeyasingh Senior Panel Counsel