- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20515/2016
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to return the jewels pledged in the Loan Account No.86 of 2006.
¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank submits that the jewels have already been returned to the petitioner, which has been admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶3Recording the same, the writ petition is closed as no further order is required. No costs.
06.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Near Aravindh Eye Hospital, Madurai.
¶2The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, W.Pudhupatti Branch, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
06.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Seela ... Petitioner versus 1. The Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Near Aravindh Eye Hospital, Madurai. 2. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, W.Pudhupatti Branch, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3. Chitra (R3 impleaded vide order dated 06.12.2017 in W.M.P.(MD)No.2025 of 2017) ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to return the jewels that pledged in loan account No.86 of 2007 weighing 118.700 grams by considering the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Angusamy For R1 and R2 : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.