R.Shanmugasundaram v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous and as such, no further adjudication is required.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in my considered view, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and it has to be dismissed as infructuous.

¶4Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶5No costs.

¶6Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

20.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director, Kumbakonam.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Trichy.

3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Found Trust, Thiruvallurvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 2.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.20534 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.16074 of 2017

20.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.20534 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.16074 of 2017 R.Shanmugasundaram ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director, Kumbakonam. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Trichy. 3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Found Trust, Thiruvallurvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 2. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent Ref: TNSTC/Kum./TRY/SM1/ 1975/2016 dated 25.04.2016, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant him 4th and 5th review benefit and to fix the pay of the petitioner in the new scale of pay of Rs. 9300-34800-Grade Pay of Rs.4300/- and to pay him arrears of difference in salary from 01.09.2010 to 30.08.2013 and to pay him difference in retiral benefits including monthly pension, gratuity, leave salary, commutation and all other attendant benefits together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from 01.07.2013 to till the date on which the above monetary benefits are settled to him. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For R 2 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For R1 : Mr.A.Jayaraman