- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1890/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The direction given by this Court has been complied with. A rejection order has been passed by the respondent. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law.
2.With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.
09.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- M.Suganya, The District Revenue Officer, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.1890 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.19418 of 2022
09.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1890 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.19418 of 2022 A.Prabhakaran ... Petitioner Vs. M.Suganya, The District Revenue Officer, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli District. ... Contemnor Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for committing contempt for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court W.P.(MD)No.19418 of 2022 dated 24.08.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.