Paulraj v. The Chairman

ORDER In an earlier occasion, there was no representation on the side of the Writ Petitioner. Since the petitioner has not represented either by Counsel or by himself to prosecute the matter, this case was posted today (i.e. 16.03.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also the petitioner is not represented by his Counsel and he is not present in person, which shows that the Writ Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Petition.

¶2Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No Costs. Index : Yes / No

16.03.2023 Internet : Yes

ksa S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 20861 of 2016

16.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 20861 of 2016 1. Paulraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Railway Board, Indian Railway, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi – 110001. 2. The Director General, Railway Protection Force, Rail Bhavan, Railway Board, New Delhi – 110001. 3. The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 3. 4. The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 3. 5. The Chairman, National Human Rights Commission, Manav Adhikar Bhawan Block-C, GOP Complex, INA, New Delhi – 110023. 6. A.Kalaiarasan 7. Sankarankutty ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner representations, dated 17.0.2015 and 25.09.2016 and to take appropriate departmental action against 6th and 7th respondents. For Petitioner : No appearance For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.K.R.Laxman Central Government Senior Panel Counsel