Irudhaya Raj .K v. The District Collector

O R D E R The Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

21.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To

1.The District Collector,

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office,

3.The Sub Collector,

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, District Collector Campus, Tirunelveli District.

5.The Thasildar, Tirunelveli Thasildar Office, Tirunelveli.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg

21.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH K.Irudhaya Raj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, 3.The Sub Collector, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, District Collector Campus, Tirunelveli District. 5.The Thasildar, Tirunelveli Thasildar Office, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner's name in the Patta No.217 relating to the land in S.No.81/1 to an extent of 3.02.5 situated at Sithaparpanallur, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District, within the time limit stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader