R.Perumal, v. The District Collector

ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court in the year 2016 with a grievance that the respondents 5 to 9 had excommunicated the petitioner and his family from the village and that the petitioner was prevented from participating in any function in the village.

2.Though notice was served on the respondents 5 to 9, there is no representation on their behalf.

3.Learned Additional Government Pleader has produced the written instructions received from the third respondent / Tahsildar dated 26.05.2023 and submitted that pursuant to his communication, the Tahsildar has conducted a peace committee meeting with the petitioner and the respondents 5 to 9 and in that meeting, the dispute between both the parties have amicably been resolved.

4.Recording the statement made by the third respondent / Tahsildar, this writ petition is closed as no further order is required to be passed. It is made clear that it is the duty of the Tahsildar to ensure that the practice of excommunication is not prevailing in her Taluk. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :

14.06.2023 NCC : gk

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk To

1.The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

14.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI R.Perumal ... Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 5.S.Ponnusamy 6.R.Durairaj 7.Duraisamy 8.Sundarajan 9.Rajasekar ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 9 by considering and passing appropriate order on the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2016 within a stipulated time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.N.R.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddhardhan, Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4 No appearance for R.5 to R.9 *****