- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21245/2016
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.06.2016 and to cancel the power deed dated 02.01.2013, by holding an enquiry under Section 83 of the Registration Act.
2.The case of the petitioner is that one Mathankumar has created a forged power deed in the petitioner's name, without his knowledge. Therefore, he has approached the respondent for appropriate action.
3.This writ petition has been filed in the year 2016. The respondent has not filed any counter affidavit till date.
4.Under such circumstances, this writ petition stands disposed of, with a direction to the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated
27.06.2016 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. If the respondent finds any forgery, necessary action has to be initiated under Sections 82 & 83 of the Registration Act. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :
14.06.2023 NCC : gk To The District Registrar (Administration), District Registration Office, Thenkarai, Periakulam, Theni District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk
14.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.Ganapathy ... Petitioner v. The District Registrar (Administration), District Registration Office, Thenkarai, Periakulam, Theni District. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2016 for cancellation of power of attorney deed dated 02.01.2013 by holding an enquiry under Section 82 of the Registration Act, within a stipulated time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sivachandran For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.