M.A.Rajaveerasekaran v. State Bank of India

O R D E R The petitioner's Savings bank Account was freezed by the respondent Bank in the year 2016 and as against the order of the Bank freezing the petitioner's account in the year 2016, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2.Today(13.12.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that pending this writ petition, the petitioner's savings bank account was de-freezed on 25.12.2017 and this petitioner was permitted to operate his account.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned standing counsel for the respondent Bank, this writ petition is closed as no further order is required. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

13.12.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Karaikudi Branch, Karaikudi. W.P(MD)No.21294 of 2016 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin W.P(MD)No.21294oofo2016oand WMP(MD)oNo.15231oofo2016

13.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.21294 of 2016 and WMP(MD) No.15231 of 2016 M.A.Rajaveerasekaran ... Petitioner Vs State Bank of India, Rep by its Branch Manager, Karaikudi Branch, Karaikudi. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to defreeze the petitioner's Savings bank Account No. 10968349865 so as to enable him to draw the monthly pension for his livelihood, which is being credited into that account within the time limit stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Standing Counsel