K. Varatharajan v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Arbitration Petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous.

¶2In view of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

06.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, Collectorate Buildings, Ramanathapurm District.

¶2The Special District Revenue Officer

cum the Authorized Officer for Land Acqusition, National Highway – 49 Collectorate building, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The Executive Engineer, National Highway-49, National Highway Department, Ramanathapuram District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

06.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Varatharajan ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Collectorate Buildings, Ramanathapurm District. 2. The Special District Revenue Officer cum the Authorized Officer for Land Acqusition, National Highway – 49 Collectorate building, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Executive Engineer, National Highway-49, National Highway Department, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to disburse the compensation to the petitioner which is awarded in award No.6 of 2013-2014 Na.Ka/NH 49/unit V/165/2013 dated 13.02.2014 on the file of the 2nd respondent and further direction directing the 1st respondent to expedite and dispose the Arbitration Petition Number B8/18687/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent dated 27.04.2015 within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Govt. Pleader