- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- P.B. Balaji
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 2592/2018
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel on either side are present.
¶2The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision has become infructuous with the passage of time.
¶3Recording the said statement of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the instant Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Index:Yes/No
12.10.2023 Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No Ls To
¶1The Principal District Munsif, Kuzhithurai.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.B.BALAJI,J. Ls
12.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P(MD)No.11385 of 2018 Muthuswamy ... Petitioner / petitioner/Plaintiff .Vs. Thankabai ... Respondent / Respondents /Defendant PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article, 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 12.09.2018 made in I.A.No. 260 of 2018 in O.S.No.241 of 2014, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kuzhithurai. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondent :Mr.T.Selvakumaran
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.