VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Muppidathi, v. The Deputy Inspector-General

DISMISSED AS ABATED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 21432/2016

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.S.Karthikeyavenkatachalapathy, learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the sole petitioner died and as such, this Writ Petition is abated. The learned counsel further submits that in view of such situation, no further adjudication is required.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Deputy Inspector – General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram

3.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.21432 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.15316 of 2016

17.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.21432 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.15316 of 2016 S.Muppidathi ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector – General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram 3.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned orders passed by the 3rd respondent in D.O.No:1152/2013 C.No: 38708/2013 dated 30.07.2013 and the 2nd respondent by his proceedings in D.No:500/2016 C.No:K3/4430/103/2015 dated 03.05.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to refix the petitioner's salary from year 1983 according to his continuous service and eligibility to get the pay under Selection Grade and also special grade in the category of Sub Inspector of Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthikeyavenkatachalapathy For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for TANGEDCO

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.