VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M/S Reliance Jio Infocomm v. The Inspector of Police,

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 July 2023
Bench
P.Dhanabalauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23231/2018

Judgment

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that already cell phone tower was erected and nothing survives for adjudication in this petition.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent also represented that cell phone tower was erected.

3.In view of the aforesaid submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.

10.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Mrn To

1.The Inspector of Police, Kulithalai Police Station, Karur District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.DHANABAL,J. Mrn Writ Petition (MD).No.23231 of 2018

10.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 10.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL M/s. Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, Represented through its Legal Manager, D.Kalaimani Having its Circle Office at A1 Tower 8th Floor, 89-90, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600004. ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, Kulithalai Police Station, Karur District. ...Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide effective police protection for erection of transmission cell phone tower and to install the telecommunication electrical and electronics equipments, OFC cable and the maintenance work on the said BTS Transmission Tower at S.No.57/4B1, Old Court Street, Kulithalai Village, Kulithalai taluk, Karur District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.