- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21569/2016
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
06.06.2023 Internet : Yes / No To
1.The Member Secretary, The National Council for Teachers Education, Hans Bhavawan Wing II, 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.
2.The Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teachers Education, Jnanabarathy Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Bengaluru – 72.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
06.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 06.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.15433 of 2016 Chellammal College of Education, EB Office Back Side, Theni Road, Andipatti – 625 512, Theni District, represented by its Correspondent, ... Petitioner Vs 1.The National Council for Teachers Education, Represented by its Member Secretary, Hans Bhavawan Wing II, 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002. 2.The Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teachers Education, Jnanabarathy Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Bengaluru – 72. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from in any manner implementing the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations 2014 prior to the completion of the process of the Committee constituted by the 1st respondent as per Public Notice dated 03.10.2016 for giving recommendations for alterations modifications or deletions to the Regulations of 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Pon Ramkumar For Respondent : Mr.Su.Srinivasan No.1 For Respondent :Mr.A.Sivaji No.2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.