- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21640/2016
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement.
2.Permission is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
16.06.2023 dsk To
1.The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Circletop House, 16, College Lane, Chennai – 600 006.
2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Manapparai Branch, Manapparai,Trichy District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
16.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI P.Balasubramani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Circletop House, 16, College Lane, Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Manapparai Branch, Manapparai,Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2016 within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Court in accordance with law. For petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu For Respondent : Mr.G.Radhakrishnan, No.2 For Respondent : No representation No.1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.