Seenivasan.M.R v. The Commissioner

O RDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Mandamus to the respondent police to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2023, to conduct an enquiry and to take action against the proposed accused.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that though the petitioner stated to have sent a online complaint on 22.04.2023, receipt of which is filed before this Court, the respondent police have not received any such complaint.

3.In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh complaint duly signed before the respondent police, on which the respondent police are directed to make an enquiry by following the procedure and complete the same as quickly as possible, not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.With the above directions, this Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Speaking : Yes / No

14.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The Commissioner, Madurai City Police, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai City, Madurai District. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J. mm W.P.(MD)No.22289 of 2023

14.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN M.R. Seenivasan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Madurai City Police, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai City, Madurai District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2023 to conduct enquiry and to take appropriate action based upon representation. For Petitioner : Mr.S. Ramsundarvijayraj For R1 and R2 : Mr.Thanga Aravindh.B Government Advocate (Crl.side)