Thiyagarajan v. Superintendent Engineer

ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing on either side submit that the writ petition has become infructuous and the learned Counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement.

2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

14.06.2023 dsk To

1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Parvathipuram, Nagercoil – 629 003.

2.The Junior Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Distribution, Distillery Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

14.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Parvathipuram, Nagercoil – 629 003. 2.The Junior Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Distribution, Distillery Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to provide temporary electricity connection in favour of the petitioner's name for electricity connection in respect of the property of Beauty Parlour shop in NMC Door No.176A, Vadasery Village, Asambu Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 03.10.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Ramakrishna Dass For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel