R.Sheela v. A.Vijay Ananth

O R D E R The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case in I.D.O.P.No.144 of 2024 pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai and transfer the same to the Additional District Court, Virudhunagar.

¶2It is evident from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 20.08.2008. It is not in dispute that the respondent has filed a petition in I.D.O.P.No.144 of 2024, seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.

¶3Despite receipt of notice, the respondent has not chosen to enter into appearance.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is residing at Virudhunagar and finds it very difficult to travel to Madurai to attend all the hearings.

¶5In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated the position with generally, it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder : "The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed."

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner is residing at Virudhunagar District, this Court is of the view that the case in I.D.O.P.No.144 of 2024, is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Madurai and transfer the same to the file of the Additional District Court, Virudhunagar. Accordingly, the learned Judge, Family Court, Madurai, is hereby directed to transmit the entire records in I.D.O.P.No.144 of 2024 to the file of the Additional District Court, Virudhunagar, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receiving the case bundle, the learned Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar, is directed to take up the petition on file and proceed in accordance with law.

¶7With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

08.01.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das To

1.The Judge, Family Court, Madurai.

2.The Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Tr.C.M.P(MD).No.576oofo2024 K.MURALIoSHANKAR,oJ. DAS Orderomadeoino Tr.C.M.Po(MD).No.576oofo2024 and C.M.P(MD)No.13523oofo2024o

08.01.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Tr.C.M.P (MD).No.576 of 2024 and C.M.P(MD)No.13523 of 2024 R.Sheela : Petitioner Vs. A.Vijay Ananth : Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in I.D.O.P.No.144 of 2024 pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai and transfer the same to the Additional District Court, Virudhunagar. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan, for M/s.Aran Legal Consultancy. For Respondent : No Appearance.