R.Marichamy v. The General Manager

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing this writ petition, nothing requires for adjudication in the present writ petition.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

3.1. In view of the above factual position, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3.2. No costs.

3.3. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

NCC : Yes/No

22.08.2023 Index : Yes/No abr To

1.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bye-Pass Road, Dindigul.

2.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bodi Branch, Theni District. W.P.(MD)oNo.21960oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.21960oofo2016 Datedo:o22.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) No.15692 of 2016 R.Marichamy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bye-Pass Road, Dindigul. 2.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bodi Branch, Theni District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allot specific bus to the petitioner as per the seniority on the basis of roaster/rotation as per 12(3) Settlement in the proceedings in Parvai: C1/4702/08 dated 06.02.2008 and as per the proceeding of the 1st respondent in Pa.No.Vanigam.Theva1116 dated 21.07.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan For Respondents : Mr.J.Senthil Kumariah Standing Counsel