G.Navamani,W/O.M.Gurusamy, v. Canara Bank,

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2Recording the said endorsement, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

25.09.2023 Index : Internet : trp To The I Additional Sub Judge, Trichirapalli. CRP(Mi).No.1989oofo2019 C.KUMARA P P AN, J., trp CRP(MD).No.o1989oofo2019oand CMP(MD).No.o10245oofo2019

25.09.2023 4/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUM A R A P P A N CRP(MD).No. 1989 of 2019 and CMP(MD).No. 10245 of 2019 G. Navamani rep.by her Power Agent G.Nakkeeran Petitioner Vs. 1.Canara Bank, Cantonment Bank, rep. by its Branch Manager, Madurai Road, Trichirapalli – 620 008. 2.A.K.Ramarajan Respondents PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order, dated 06.08.2019 made in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.530 of 1999 on the file of the I Additional Sub Judge, Trichirapalli. For Petitioner : Mr. K. Arunraj For Respondent No.1 : Mr.R.Pandivel