- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22423/2016
Judgment
ORDER When the matter came up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the aforesaid submission and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :
16.06.2023 NCC : gk WP(MD)No.22423 of 2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
WP(MD)No.22423 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD)No.22423 of 2016 P.Kavitha ... Petitioner v. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Kambliyampatti, Dindigul. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's loan application on merits and in accordance with law and sanction the loan amount to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. For Petitioner : Ms.X.Sumalatha For Respondent : Mr.R.Pandivel ***** WP(MD)No.22423 of 2016 B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.