- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 23362/2018
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
01.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Trichy. Dated : 01.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Velan Builders (P) Ltd., No.3, Periyar Thottam, Ponneripuram Main Road, Ponmalaipatti, Tiruchirappalli, Represented by its, Managing Director, Kannaiyan. .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Trichy. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of of Mandamus, directing the respondent to open the price bid for the works relating to Package Nos.1 and 4 of Tender Notification No.192/2018-19 issued by the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondent : No-appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.