Rajamaravan v. The Superintendent of Police

O RDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a direction to the respondent police to take action in respect of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 31.07.2023.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a cooking vessel belonging to the petitioner community people, aged about 300 years and the respondent No.3 took the said vessel, for which a complaint is filed, but no action stated to have been taken, thereby sought for suitable directions.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the cooking vessel referred by the petitioner is in the safe custody of the Grama Panchayat for the last 60 years.

4.Since the respondent No.3 in the capacity of the Executive Officer of the Panchayat has got the same in the office for safe custody, no further directions can be given in this petition.

5.Accordingly, this Petition is closed. No costs.

Speaking : Yes / No

21.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Courtalam Police Station, Tenkasi District. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J. mm W.P.(MD)No.22880 of 2023

21.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN Rajamaravan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Courtalam Police Station, Tenkasi District. 3.Manickavel ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No. 1 and 2 herein to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent on the basis of the complaint dated 31.07.2023 within a stipulated time period in accordance with law. For Petitioner : C.Senthil Murugan For R1 & R2 : Mr.SS.Madhavan Government Advocate (Crl.side)