- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22647/2016
Judgment
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :
10.11.2023 NCC : Internet : ssb To
1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Dindigul-Trichy Bye-pass Road, Dindigul.
2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Executive Engineer, Oddanchathram Division, Oddanchathram Town.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Kannivadi Post, Dindigul West Taluk.
4.The Assistant Engineer (Electrical), TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Moolachathram, Dindigul West Taluk.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb
10.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Chinnakalai .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Dindigul-Trichy Bye-pass Road, Dindigul. 2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Executive Engineer, Oddanchathram Division, Oddanchathram Town. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Kannivadi Post, Dindigul West Taluk. 4.The Assistant Engineer (Electrical), TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Moolachathram, Dindigul West Taluk. 5.V.Chockalingam .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to disconnect the electricity connection given in the name of the fifth respondent by the fourth respondent to the property in S.No.578/7, Ramalingampatti, Kamatchipuram Village, Dindigul District, immediately granted in violation of judgment and decree dated 25.08.2016 passed in O.S.No.365 of 2011 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, within the time limit fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.L.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R1 to R4 Mr.A.L.Kannan for R5 *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.