K.Paramasivam, v. The Madurai Corporation,

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner is died and the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner are not interested to prosecute the case.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In view of the same, this Writ Petition is closed.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No RM To

1.The Madurai Corporation, Through its Commissioner, Arignar Anna Maligai, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner (Accounts), Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Maligai, Madurai.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM W.P.(MD)No.22666 of 2016

07.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.22666 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.16222 of 2016 K. Paramasivam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Madurai Corporation, Through its Commissioner, Arignar Anna Maligai, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner (Accounts), Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Maligai, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating with the order of the second respondent made in Na.Ka.No.W1/19578/2015, dated 16.09.2016 and quash the same as it is illegal and in consequence to direct the respondents to disburse the petitioner a sum of Rs.1,04,040/- which is wrongly deducted by them towards the recovery of commutation in his monthly pension, with interest. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinayak