V.V.Karuppiah, v. The Divisional Commercial

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

26.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Divisional Commercial Manager/Co-ordn., Divisional Office, Commercial Branch, Southern Railway, Madurai – 625 016.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

26.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI V.V.Karuppiah ... Petitioner versus The Divisional Commercial Manager/Co-ordn., Divisional Office, Commercial Branch, Southern Railway, Madurai – 625 016. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.11.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondent : Mr.K.R.Laxman