M.Elangovan v. The Managing Director

ORDER Mr.S.Prabhu, learned counsel for the petitioner, represents that in view of the subsequent developments after filing of this writ petition, this writ petition has become infructuous and sought to close this writ petition.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

¶3In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

14.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

3.The Assistant Manager, Employees and Administration, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. W.P.(MD)oNo.23165oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.23165oofo2016 Datedo:o14.07.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.16636 and 16637 of 2016 M.Elangovan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 3.The Assistant Manager, Employees and Administration, Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the second respondent by his impugned proceedings in Letter No.616/PAP-E3/TNSTC(K)NAGAI/2016 dated 21.11.2016 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner as driver in temporary post on the basis of the third respondent proceedings vide No.T.N.S.T.C/KUMK/E3/70/2010 dated 27.12.2010 in his office. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman Standing Counsel