P.Senthil Kumar v. The District Collector

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider 1 to 6 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 05.06.2026 of the Petitioner seeking the relief of opening the traditional pathway for the bona fide agricultural activities.

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶3By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Since no adverse order is going to be passed, notice to the seventh respondent is dispensed with.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 05.06.2026 requesting the respondents to restore and open the traditional pathway to enable access for carrying on bona fide agricultural activities. It is further submitted that, despite receipt of the said representation, the respondents have not passed any orders thereon. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

¶5The learned counsel further submitted that it would suffice if this Court issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.06.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the necessary parties including the seventh respondent. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

29.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To

¶1The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai 625020.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai 625020.

¶3The Deputy Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Division VI Anaiyur, Mudakathan Main Road, Madurai 625017.

¶4The Assistant Director (Panchayat), Madurai Collectorate Campus, Madurai 625020.

¶5The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Vadipatti 625218, Madurai District.

¶6The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), PHC Road, Alanganallur 625501, Madurai District. M.DHANDAPANI

,J.

PKN DATED : 29.07.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner(s) vs. 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai 625020. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai 625020. 3. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Division VI Anaiyur, Mudakathan Main Road, Madurai 625017. 4. The Assistant Director (Panchayat), Madurai Collectorate Campus, Madurai 625020. 5. The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Vadipatti 625218, Madurai District. 6. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), PHC Road, Alanganallur 625501, Madurai District. 7. S.Prabakaran ... Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider 1 to 6 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 05.06.2026 of the Petitioner seeking the relief of opening the traditional pathway for the bona fide agricultural activities. For Petitioner : Mr. A.John Vincent For R1 to R5 : Ms.K.R.Shivashankari, Counsel for State For R6 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Counsel for State