VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.B.Rajakumar v. The Secretary

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23369/2016

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, claiming to be a Local Cable TV Operator, has filed this writ petition for a mandamus forbearing the second respondent from allotting any new Local Cable TV Operator in existing Local Cable TV Operator area.

2.This type of relief cannot be granted by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3.Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index :

22.06.2023 NCC : gk

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

22.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.16794 of 2016 A.B.Rajakumar ... Petitioner v. 1.The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 'A' Sing Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Rep. by General Manager, 'Dugar Towers' 6th Floor, Old no.34, New No.123, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to forbear the second respondent from allotting new Local Cable TV Operator in existing Local Cable TV Operator area and allow the petitioner to provide Digital Addressable System Signal to the petitioner's intending customers based on the representation of the petitioner dated 26.11.2016 and to direct the first respondent to take action on the second respondent and its officials for disturbing the implementation of Digital Addressable System. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For Respondents : No appearance *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.