VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Gurusamy, Junior Auditor, v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23539/2016

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.G.Karthik, learned counsel represents Mr.S.Louis, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments after filing this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

19.07.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No RM To

1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman Cum Managing Director,

2.The Secretary Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,

3.The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Administrative Branch, TANGEDCO, N.P.K.R.R.Maligai,

4.The Chief Internal Audit Officer, Audit Branch, TANGEDCO, 1st Floor, N.P.K.R.R.Maligai,

BATTU DEVANAND, J. rm (2/7)

19.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P(MD)Nos.16899 to 16901 of 2016 S.Gurusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman Cum Managing Director, 2.The Secretary Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., 3.The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Administrative Branch, TANGEDCO, N.P.K.R.R.Maligai, 4.The Chief Internal Audit Officer, Audit Branch, TANGEDCO, 1st Floor, N.P.K.R.R.Maligai, ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in U.O.Note No.094451/802/G. 21/G.213/2016-1, dated 18.11.2016 on the file of the third respondent and the consequential impugned order in Memo No.047480/1988/F.1/F. 12/2016-17, dated 21.11.2016 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to retain the petitioner as Junior Auditor till the promotion to the post of Auditor. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik for Mr.S.Louis For Respondents : Mrs.M.Parameswari

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.