R.Jeyachandran v. The Director General of

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the developments happened after filing this writ petition, the writ petition has become infructuous and as such sought to close this writ petition as infructuous.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

24.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4.

2.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai District.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai District. W.P.(MD)oNo.24230oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.24230oofo2016 Datedo:o24.07.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND R.Jayachandran .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4. 2.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in Rc.No.176058/NGB-I(1)/2016 dated 23.11.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to include the petitioner's name in the C list dated 16.07.2016 in C.No.16122/A1/2016, Z.O.No. 99/2016 and promote him from the date date of 16.07.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader