A.Rajakannu v. The Director

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is not able to contact the petitioner, which shows that the Writ Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Petition.

¶2Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to reopen the case, if so advised. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No

03.04.2023 Internet : Yes

ksa To

1.The Director, Treasuries and Account Department, Chennai – 600 015.

¶2The Sub-Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 24317 of 2016

03.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 24317 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.17563 of 2016 A.Rajakannu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Treasuries and Account Department, Chennai – 600 015. 2. The Sub-Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent relating to his impugned order in Na.Ka.No.2172/E/2016, dated 23.09.2016 and quash the same and directing the 2nd Respondent to pay the pension to the petitioner which he received previously to the impugned order, based on the earlier calculation by fixing his basic pension as Rs.11,100/-. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Anand For Respondents : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader