- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 23161/2019
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 18.10.2019 blacklisting the petitioner from participating in the tenders of the Highways Department for a period of three years.
¶2The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has produced fake documents and therefore, he was blacklisted by the second respondent for a period of three years.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was blacklisted for a period of three years and now, the period is over. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.
¶4In view of the said submission, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To
1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways), O/o. Superintending Engineer (Highways), Construction and Maintenance, Tirunelveli Circle, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Divisional Engineer (National Highways), Buildings and Maintenance, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. W.P.(MD) No.23161 of 2019 Dated : 29.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD) No.23161 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.19871 and 19872 of 2019 Y.Jeya Singh .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways), O/o. Superintending Engineer (Highways), Construction and Maintenance, Tirunelveli Circle, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Divisional Engineer (National Highways), Buildings and Maintenance, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned order in Letter No.2455/2019/VI dated 18.10.2019 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to allow the petitioner to participate in the tenders of the Highways Department within the time period to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.