- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 October 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24582/2016
Judgment
O R D E R
This writ petition was filed for a Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue a patta in favour of the petitioner, based on the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai in Nee.Mu. 7231/2015 dated 13.11.2015.
2.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the order of Revenue Divisional Officer has already been complied with and patta was also issued to this petitioner. A copy of the patta has been produced before this Court.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is closed. No costs.
06.10.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To The Tahsildar, North Taluk, Collectorate Building, Madurai.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn
06.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Subramani ... Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar, North Taluk, Collectorate Building, Madurai. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue the patta in favour of the petitioner based upon order in Nee.Mu. 7231/2015 dated 13.11.2015 by Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.