Subramanian.K v. The Authorized Officer

ORDER When the writ petition came up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the similar writ petitions filed by other petitioners were dismissed by this Court on 15.09.2023 in WP(MD)No.387 of 2007, etc., batch.

2.Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has also confirmed the same.

3.In view of the same, placing appreciation to the learned Counsel for the petitioner for his fair submission, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index :

19.09.2023 NCC : gk To

1.The Authorized Officer & Joint Commissioner, Land Reforms, Tirunelveli.

2.The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

3.The Tahsildar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

19.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.18954, 18956 of 2023 K.Subramanian ... Petitioner v. 1.The Authorized Officer & Joint Commissioner, Land Reforms, Tirunelveli. 2.The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The Tahsildar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 4.The Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings in No.A2/MRI/23R/TNV dated 30.01.2013 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents not to interfere with the assignment already made with regard to S.No.352/3b part under new sub division in the southern portion to the extent of 30 cents, out of 1.81 acres Ariyakulam Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate *****