VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mohamed Iliyas v. The Inspector of Police

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 October 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17432/2023

Judgment

O RDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.39 of 2021 on the file of the 1st respondent police.

2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.39 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 406, 498(A), 506(i) of IPC against the petitioners.

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels.

4.The petitioners 2 to 12 and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

¶5The Petitioner No.1 / Accused No.1 who is stated to be in prison connected to some other case. Except the first petitioner, all other petitioners are present before this Court. The defacto complainant also present and stated that as per religious customary practice, the marriage has been dissolved among themselves.

6.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 07.09.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in Crime No.39 of 2021 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police as against the petitioners 2 to 12, is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded. The first petitioner is concerned, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with liberty to the first petitioner / Accused No.1 to revive the application at appropriate time. The first petitioner is permitted to appear through video conference as well as the defacto complainant, if the first petitioner revives the application for quash on the ground of compromise.

7.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands partly allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.39 of 2021, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners 2 to 12 and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

09.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pnn To

1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karur District. (Crime No.39/2021)

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. pnn Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17432 of 2023

09.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17432 of 2023 1.Mohamed Iliyas 2.Mohamed Hussain 3.Jafar Nisha 4.A.M.MohamedImthiyas 5.V.S.A.Rahim 6.KathijaBanu 7.Mohammed Siddiq 8.Mohammed Farook Ali 9.Mohammed Ashik Ali 10.Syed Abuthahir 11.Mumtaj Begum 12.Sathick Basha ... Petitioners 1 to 12 / Accused Nos.1 to 12 Vs. 1.The State by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karur District. (Crime No.39/2021) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Imrana Banu ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.39 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police in AWPS Police Station, Karur dated 24.12.2021 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ramsundar Vijayraj For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.A.Mohamed Ismail

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.